IPPA Institute Of Public Policy And Administration

연구소소식

새소식

Administrative Reform in Korea - 조성한
 작성자 : 관리자
작성일 : 2010-12-05     조회 : 8,322  
Administrative Reform in Korea

HERALD webmaster@herald.cau.ac.kr

▲ Prof. Cho Sung-han

Korean people regard public servants as authoritative, lazy, and corruptive. If that's true, why is the job so popular among Koreans? Ultimately, who does become public servant in Korea?


It is very difficult to become a public servant in Korea. One has to pass the very competitive recruitment exam, an exam that is so competitive that less than one percent of the candidates pass.


Why did the concept of the Korean servant become so notorious? The problem is rooted in the administrative system, not individual characters. The system is quite inefficient, authoritative, and sometimes corruptive, and this is exactly why we need administrative reform..


Actually, the Korean government has pursued administrative reform for the last 10 years. However, Korean people have not recognized any difference since the reform, not because Korean reformers have not worked hard, but because they have applied wrong measures for the reform.


The Kim Dae Jung administration brought New Public Management(NMP) paradigm into the Korean government. NPM aims at fostering a performance-oriented culture in a less centralized public sector'.

In short, this new paradigm is characterized by the following nine main trends: 1) devolving authority, providing flexibility; 2) ensuring performance, control, accountability; 3) developing competition and choice, market-type mechanisms; 4) providing responsive services, client orientation; 5) improving the management of human resources; 6) optimizing information technology; 7) improving the quality of regulation; 8) strengthening the steering functions at the centre; 9) private sector style management.


Developed in England, NPM has spread rapidly to countries all over the world regardless of its effectiveness level. Korea is one of the countries that have applied NPM to administrative reform. However, it is not very effective because NPM bases its ideological background on neo-libertarianism which has strong individualistic cultural context while Koreans tend to be collectivistic.


This does not mean that all reform measures of NPM cannot be applied to Korea. Korean government needs to adjust NPM to Korean culture. NPM is like an empty canvass and you can paint on it whatever you like. What Korea needs is 'a culture specific administrative reform.' Culture and ideology are as strong a force as economic need in the development of NPM. Local management is part of culture infrastructure; it cannot be imported in package form. Even most continental European countries such as Germany and France could introduce NPM to their countries with limited success.


Any kind of reform needs to be incremental, in fact, England's government calls it 'evolution' instead of 'revolution.' However, Korean reformers could not take incremental measures to reform government. They decided to just copy the British NPM model and they failed. Furthermore, reformers have not recognized their failure, and they still stick to their reform measures.


According to Geert Hofstede's research, Korea is ranked 43rd in individualism among 53 countries. That means Korea has a collectivist society. Korea does not have only collectivist culture but also vertical culture; vertical collectivist(VC) culture. The vertical cultures are more hierarchical, and the horizontal cultures emphasize equality. The personality traits of the Korean people are authoritarianism, collectivism, personalism, connectionism, secularism, and formalistic ritualism.


The Korean administrative culture has been affected by environmental national culture. Therefore, the Korean administrative culture emphasizes hierarchical relationships and order in terms of superior-subordinates and elder-youth status positions.


It stresses ingroup activity over individual activity. It has the tendency to build a social network on the basis of certain particularistic relationships and emphasizes close personalities. These traits of Korean administrative culture can be defined as vertical collectivism.
It is important to note that any specific culture is not better than any other culture for human functioning. Instead each culture pattern is functional in different situations.

For example, in horizontal individualistic societies, individuals do their own thing without restraints provided ingroups while in vertical collectivist pattern groups provide protection and security and reduce the need for personal decisions.


Management practices are culture specific, yet neither the individualistic management practices nor the collectivistic management practices are superior to one another. Generally, individualism encourages individual interests and competitiveness. Therefore, performance related payment may be appropriate in individualist society, especially in vertical individualistic society. However, collectivism encourages collective interests and cooperative behaviors. Team-based, or seniority-based payment system fit collectivist cultures.


Human resource management(HRM) practices must also be placed on a continuum between individualistically-oriented vs. collectivistically-oriented ends. Whenever a misfit occurs between an organization's HRM systems and the individual's individualism/collectivism orientation, such an organization may very well experience negative consequences like lower employee morale, lower levels of motivation, lower job performance, and possibly a higher level of employee turnover.


However, Korean administrative reform for the last decade has copied the British NPM model that is strongly rooted in individualistic neo-libertarianism and failed. Other countries, including France, Sweden and Germany, gave up applying the British NPM model to their administrative reform at the beginning level. These countries say that British NPM does not fit their culture. They have developed their own NPM nodel. If the British NPM model does not fit those countries in which individualism tendencies are much stronger than in Korea, it does not fit our culture.


Changing the culture and structure will disrupt existing power networks in organization, resulting in resistance, which can be expensive and time-consuming to overcome. It is not possible to change organizational culture that is strongly connected to national culture. Korean reformers must conduct a culture and structure diagnosis first. Then, they will get the idea about what kind of administrative reform model fits the culture.
We may need political reform before administrative reform. The trait of Korean public servant - laziness, corruption, authoritative behavior- might come from the political environment instead of the administrative system. NPM is close to efficiency while democracy is close to moral, ethics and values.


By Prof. Cho Sung-han
Dept. of Public Administration

출처: http://www.cauon.net/news/print.php?idxno=7588
 
 

제목과 내용 통합검색. 키워드별로 한칸 띄워 입력
번호 제목 작성자 등록일 조회수
53 국가정책연구소 학술지원금 규정(신설) - [종료] 관리자 03-02 49377
52 2020년 05월 이용규교수님 연구용역과제 수주 관리자 05-11 51077
51 2019년 04월 이용규교수님 연구용역과제 수주 관리자 04-01 51799
50 2019년 01월 이용규교수님 연구용역과제 수주 관리자 03-01 51899
49 2019년 01월 '공공인재교육센터' 신설 관리자 01-21 3919
48 2018년 10월 이용규교수님 연구용역과제 수주 관리자 10-25 4848
47 2018년 07월 송용찬교수님 연구용역과제 수주 관리자 07-26 4966
46 2018년 07월 이용규 교수님 연구용역과제 수주 관리자 07-26 4861
45 2018년 04월 송용찬교수님 연구용역과제 수주 관리자 04-26 4718
44 2018년 04월 이용규교수님 연구용역과제 수주 관리자 04-18 4895
43 2018년 03월 제16대 연구소장 박희봉 교수 취임 관리자 03-15 4718
42 2018년 02월 송용찬교수님 연구용역과제 수주 관리자 02-15 5162
41 2016년 12월 01일 송용찬교수님 연구용역과제 수주 관리자 12-02 4817
40 2016년 10월 01일 김동환교수님 연구용역과제 수주 관리자 10-03 5413
39 2016년 05월 30일 이용규교수님 연구용역과제 수주 관리자 05-31 5683
38 2016년 03월 제15대 연구소장 김동환 교수 취임 관리자 03-17 5363
37 2015년 02월 제 14대 연구소장 홍준현 교수 취임 관리자 02-18 4955
36 2014년 03월 15일 심준섭교수님 연구용역과제 수주 관리자 03-17 5213
35 2013년 08월 제 13대 연구소장 심준섭 교수 취임 관리자 08-15 5115
34 2010년 01월 제11대 연구소장 박회봉 교수 취임 관리자 04-05 3478
33 2010년 05월 15일 심준섭교수님 연구용역과제 수주 관리자 04-05 6040
32 2010년 05월 15일 허만형교수님 연구용역과제 수주 관리자 04-05 5802
31 2011년 01월 <국가정책연구> KCI등재지 선정 관리자 04-05 4628
30 2011년 6월 30일 심준섭교수님 연구용역과제 수주 관리자 04-05 5698
29 2011년 08월 제12대 연구소장 허만형 교수 취임 관리자 04-05 5701
28 2011년 09월 5일 허만형교수님 연구용역과제 수주 관리자 04-05 6059
27 Administrative Reform in Korea - 조성한 관리자 12-05 8323
26 2009년 박희봉교수님 연구용역과제 수주 관리자 06-30 5361
25 2009년 국가정책연구소 세미나 개최 관리자 06-30 3763
24 <국가정책연구> 제23권 제2호 발간 관리자 06-30 4218
1 2

국가정책연구소 빠른링크

위로 아래로

국가정책연구소 관련기관 배너

중앙대학교 공공인재학부 중앙대학교 행정대학원 중앙대학교 표준고위과정 중앙대학교 융복합표준정책학과